What do firms actually mean when they say ‘disruption’?
Because it’s absolutely not something my mum looks for from a financial services institution
The Lang Cat
-
-
Technology is not a one-and-done solution for advisers
And spending millions on due diligence in terms of time and resources is ‘frankly ridiculous’
-
Advisers pester fund groups to cut fees
Despite only 9% having cut their own costs in recent years
-
UK regulator says tech tools aren’t a ‘silver bullet’
‘Miscalibration’ and a lack of due diligence ‘can lead to very poor outcomes’
-
Should investment trusts become the norm for IFAs?
Financial advisers have a ‘duty’ to analyse all asset classes when building client portfolios
-
Snowballing pension charges could cost up to £40,000
Making the wrong choice early on can have massive implications for a client’s retirement pot
-
UK platforms failing to provide income to retirees
‘Customers are being hampered by inflexible and infrequent payments and a lack of innovation’
-
Costs and admin issues stop advisers doing platform transfers
Over half of IFAs would not recommend it to a client as they seek more guidance from regulator
-
UK watchdog eyes ban on investment platform exit fees
Investors are ‘getting shafted by poor execution, opaque funds and sneaky fees’
-
Pension decumulation provisions still ‘thin on the ground’
‘Technology not a barrier’ but providers need to start innovating
-
Advisers face tough grilling on client portfolio performance
Market volatility and Mifid II fee disclosure set to test adviser-client relationship
-
Is Mifid II working?
Mifid II has proved every bit as problematic as we feared. The development budget consumed across providers, advisers and discretionary fund managers (DFMs) in the lead-up to launch amounts to more millions than anyone cares to add up. And the spending hasn’t stopped.